论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨医院—社区—家庭护理对高血压患者血压控制及生活质量的影响。方法将本院2015年8—12月康复出院的80例高血压患者随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,对照组出院后给予出院常规指导,观察组实施医院—社区—家庭护理,3个月后比较两组血压和生活质量。计量资料比较采用t检验,计数资料比较采用χ~2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果观察组干预后的收缩压、舒张压[(118.65±15.23)、(92.54±11.21)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 k Pa)]均低于对照组[(127.23±15.12)、(104.26±7.23)mm Hg],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组干预后的角色、社会、躯体、情绪、认知功能评分[(72.23±15.55)、(71.56±10.26)、(76.21±12.14)、(73.44±11.27)、(75.58±11.35)分]均高于对照组[(64.21±11.13)、(63.06±10.37)、(64.88±12.23)、(66.32±10.43)、(68.21±11.39)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论医院—社区—家庭护理能够提高高血压患者院外的血压控制水平,改善生活质量。
Objective To explore the influence of hospital-community-home care on blood pressure control and quality of life in hypertensive patients. Methods Eighty hypertensive patients discharged from our hospital from August to December in 2015 were randomly divided into observation group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases). The control group were given general guidelines of discharge after hospital discharge, hospital-community-home care After months, blood pressure and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Measurement data were compared using t test, count data were compared using χ ~ 2 test, P <0.05 for the difference was statistically significant. Results The systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group [(118.65 ± 15.23), (92.54 ± 11.21) mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa)] [(127.23 ± 15.12) and (104.26 ± 7.23 mm Hg], the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). The score of role, social, physical, emotional and cognitive function in observation group [(72.23 ± 15.55), (71.56 ± 10.26), (76.21 ± 12.14), (73.44 ± 11.27) and (75.58 ± 11.35) (64.21 ± 11.13), (63.06 ± 10.37), (64.88 ± 12.23), (66.32 ± 10.43), (68.21 ± 11.39), respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (all P <0.05). Conclusion Hospital-community-home care can improve blood pressure control and improve quality of life in hypertensive patients.