论文部分内容阅读
2013年8月,赵方媛夫妇向法院提起诉讼,以民间借贷纠纷为由,要求小三刘玉偿还56万包养费。其后不久,刘玉以名誉权受损为由,反将赵方媛夫妇告上法院。法院判决结果让人大跌眼镜。两起诉讼案均以赵方媛夫妇败诉,小三胜诉结束。56万包养费不但没要回来,赵方媛夫妇还要给小三赔礼道歉并赔偿。这场家庭保卫战为何会这样落幕?小三来袭,幸福家庭陷入危机2013年3月9日傍晚,赵方媛正在家中准备晚饭。菜切好后,她发现酱油没了,便给丈夫曹伟强打电电话拨通后,铃声却在家里响起来。赵方媛四处寻找,发现丈夫
In August 2013, Zhao Fangyuan and his couple filed a lawsuit in court demanding that Liu Xiaoyu, a junior student, repay a total of 560,000 custodian fees on the ground of civil loan disputes. Not long afterwards, Liu Yu sued Zhao Fangyuan and his wife for court on the ground that his right of reputation was damaged. The outcome of the court decision surprised people. Two lawsuits were unsuccessful couple Zhao Fangyuan, the victory over the little three. Not only did not bring back the 560,000 package fees, Zhao Fang Yuan couple also apologized to the third trimester and compensation. Why is this home defending war ended? Junior 3 struck, happy family in crisis March 9, 2013 evening, Zhao Fangyuan is preparing dinner at home. When the dish was cut, she found that the sauce was gone and called her husband Cao Weiqiang after the call was made. The ring was ringing at home. Zhao Fangyuan looking around and found her husband