AIM: To evaluate the effect of resistance to activated protein C (aPCR), the most common known inherited thrombophilic disorder, on the risk of intestinal operation of fi brostenosis in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). METHODS: In a previous study, we assessed the prevalence of aPCR in CD. In a retrospective case- controlled study, 8 of these CD patients with aPCR were now compared with 24 CD patients without aPCR, matched by gender, age at diagnosis and duration of disease in a 1:3 fashion. The primary end point was the occurrence of an intestinal CD-related operation with evidence of fibrostenosis in the bowel resection specimen. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with aPCR had a lower probability of remaining free of operation with f ibrostenosis than patients without aPCR (P = 0.0372; exact log-rank test) resulting in a signifi cantly shorter median time interval from diagnosis of CD to the fi rst operation with fi brostenosis (32 vs 160 mo). At 10 years, the likelihood of remaining free of operation with fi brostenosis was 25% for patients with aPCR and 57.8% for patients without aPCR. CONCLUSION: CD patients with aPCR are at higher risk to undergo intestinal operation of fi brostenosis than those without aPCR. This supports our hypothesis of aPCR being a possible risk factor for fi brostenosis in CD. AIM: To evaluate the effect of resistance to activated protein C (aPCR), the most common known inherited thrombophilic disorder, on the risk of intestinal operation of fi brostenosis in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). METHODS: In a previous study, we assessed the prevalence of aPCR in CD. In a retrospective case-controlled study, 8 of these CD patients with a PCR were now compared with 24 CD patients without aPCR, matched by gender, age at diagnosis and duration of disease in a 1: 3 fashion The primary end point was the occurrence of an intestinal CD-related operation with evidence of fibrostenosis in the bowel resection specimen. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with a PCR had a lower probability of remaining free of operation with f ibrostenosis than patients without aPCR (P = 0.0372; exact log-rank test) resulting in a signifi cantly shorter median time interval from diagnosis of CD to the fi rst operation with fi brostenosis (32 vs 160 mo). At 10 years , the likelihood of remaining free of operation with fi brostenosis was 25% for patients with aPCR and 57.8% for patients without aPCR. CONCLUSION: CD patients with atPCR are at higher risk to would intestinal operation of fi brostenosis than those without aPCR. our hypothesis of aPCR being a possible risk factor for fi brostenosis in CD.