论文部分内容阅读
汉语保留宾语被动句在语义、语类和形态三方面都有其自身的要求:典型领属关系、宾语成分的不定指性和动词的复合性构造。鉴于“张三被杀了父亲”蕴含亲属关系、有定宾语和单语素动词,因而不宜将其视为汉语保留宾语被动句的典型代表。认知语言学有关领属关系典型性的研究和历史语言学有关“死”类动词因何添置了“丧失”义的研究都支持该观点。文章认为,汉语生成语法研究在基于内省构拟例句时,应该将母语直觉判断置于优先于理论推衍的地位。
Retaining Object in Chinese Passive sentences have their own requirements in semantic, linguistic and morphological aspects: the typical relationship between the genres, the indefinite referents of the object components and the compound constructions of the verbs. In view of “Zhang San was killed father ” contains kinship, fixed objects and single-prime verbs, and therefore should not be regarded as a typical representative of the Chinese reserved object passive sentences. Cognitive linguistics typically deals with the relationship between taxonomy and historical linguistics. This view is supported by studies on why “verb” verbs have “lost” meaning. The article holds that the study of Chinese grammar should be based on introspection to construct the example sentence, the mother tongue intuition should be placed prior to the theoretical derivation position.