论文部分内容阅读
美术史和美术理论的研究中,不同观点,不同见解的论争,本是十分正常和平常的事情。只有坚持“百家争鸣”,各抒己见,造成讨论问题的良好风气和宽松环境,才能促进研究工作的深入开展。人们对事物的认识往往并不是一次就能完成的,认识过程中也还可能出现这样或那样的反复,因此,准你说,准我说,也准他说,大家本着实事求是的精神去寻求探讨,当可能使我们的认识一步步更接近真理。本期 刊发羿斌先生与徐书城先生商榷的文章,其目的大概也不过如此。 李昕、李光复二先生考证认为,唐代画家“顾生”并非“顾况”,他始创的泼墨泼彩画法值得后人重视,并对其流传过程中存在的某些问题提出了自己的看法、研究者只要不人云亦云,肯在“认真”二字上下功夫,就会有一些新的思考和新的收获。
In the study of art history and art theory, disputes of different viewpoints and different opinions are very normal and ordinary things. Only by sticking to the “one hundred schools of thought” and expressing their own opinions and creating a good atmosphere and relaxed environment for discussing issues can we promote the in-depth development of our research work. People’s understanding of things is often not completed once, and this process may or may not be repeated in the course of cognition. Therefore, you should say that you should seek to seek truth from facts in the spirit of seeking truth from facts Explore, when possible, may bring our understanding closer to the truth step by step. This issue of Mr. Yi Bin and Mr. Xu Shucheng deliberation of the article, its purpose is probably nothing more. Li Xin and Li Kuang Fu-er argue that “Gu-sheng”, an artist in the Tang Dynasty, was not “Gu-chang”. His pioneering ink-and-splash painting deserved attention from the descendants and proposed some problems in the process of its spread My opinion is that as long as people are willing to talk about it and are willing to work hard on the word “serious,” there will be some new thoughts and new gains.