论文部分内容阅读
社会学解释方法着重于对社会效果的预测和社会目的的衡量,可谓法律“进化的棱镜”。由于法院所履行的司法权能存在差异,因此社会学解释方法在司法中的运用表现为值得区分的两个方法层面,即作为普通法律的解释方法的社会学解释与作为宪法解释方法的社会学解释。在内容与性质上,社会学解释方法司法运用的实体理由可厘定为法规范在社会中的新含义、解释结论良好的社会效应和实现新的社会福利三种形态。就转型中国的司法治理而言,社会学解释方法的运用对案件裁判具有积极意义,但其操作必须处于必要的界限之内,且应将法律的一致性和可预期性作为可追求的最大社会福利。
Sociological methods of interpretation focus on the prediction of social effects and social purposes, can be described as the law “prism of evolution ”. Because of differences in judicial power performed by courts, the application of sociological interpretation methods in the judiciary shows two distinguishing methodological levels: sociological interpretation as common law interpretation and sociological explanation as constitutional interpretation method . In terms of content and nature, the practical reasons for the judicial application of sociological interpretation methods can be determined as the new meaning of legal norms in the society, the explanation of good social effects and the realization of new social welfare. As for the transitional justice in China, the application of the sociological interpretation method has positive significance to the case adjudication. However, its operation must be within the necessary limits and the law consistency and predictability should be taken as the largest society to be pursued welfare.