论文部分内容阅读
世界贸易组织成立以来的诸多贸易争端中,虽有争端涉及《技术性贸易壁垒协定》,但专家组或上诉机构往往因为被诉成员已经违反世界贸易组织其他协定而出于司法经济的原则拒绝裁定争议措施是否违反《技术性贸易壁垒协定》。这种情况在2012年发生变化。2012年,世界贸易组织争端解决机构分别裁决了美国丁香烟产销措施案(以下简称“美国丁香烟案”)、加拿大、墨西哥诉美
Among the many trade disputes since the establishment of the WTO, although the dispute involves the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, the panel or the appellate body often refuses to adjudicate disputes on the principle of the judicial economy because the accused members have violated other agreements of the World Trade Organization Does the measure violate the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade? This situation changed in 2012. In 2012, the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization ruled separately the production and marketing measures of the United States of Cigarette (hereinafter referred to as “the United States of America’s Cigarettes Case”), Canada, Mexico v. United States