论文部分内容阅读
公诉权和司法权作为现代刑事诉讼中非常重要的权力,在本质上具有同源性,都是国家权力在刑事诉讼中的变体。但同时二者又具有异质性,二者不能简单在国家的名义下而结合,这是与制度设计者或立法者的原意不相符合的。因此,必须理性地对二者的角色以及相互关系进行定位。因为这决定着刑事诉讼的良性运作乃至法治国的形成。从哲学的视角通过冲突——衡平的方法论对我国公诉权与司法权关系进行透视和分析,以异域的法制为借鉴,或许可以找到一条现实的可行路径。
As a very important power in modern criminal procedure, public prosecution rights and judicial power have the same origin in nature, and all are the variations of state power in criminal proceedings. At the same time, however, the two are heterogeneous. They can not be simply combined under the name of the state, which is incompatible with the original intention of the system designer or legislator. Therefore, we must rationally determine the roles and relationships between the two. Because this determines the healthy operation of criminal proceedings and the formation of the country ruled by law. From the philosophical perspective through the conflict - equitable method of perspective and analysis of the relationship between public prosecution and judicial power in our country, with the foreign legal system as a reference, we may find a realistic and feasible path.