论文部分内容阅读
尽管医学界已发表大量论文,提倡将太极拳广泛运用于健康相关方面,但几乎还没有这些方案的广泛、系统应用。这也许归咎于有能力资助实施和监督大型计划的组织太少,例如缺乏政府健康机构或者同老年医疗保健有关的全国性非政府组织。但由于在确定太极拳的效力和效益方面存在相互矛盾的优先级和标准,所以缺乏证据证明这些组织应承担这些项目。现有的效力通过可接受的设计(例如涉及到严格协议的随机对照实验)来保证内部效力有意义,但需用不同的方法演示研究控制之外的效益。本文通过检查医学文献中随机对照实验、系统综述及传播研究的质量、数量、相对比率,强调效力和效益研究的重点不同阻碍了关于太极拳研究体系的健康发展,指出除非有更多研究人员都承诺会长期系统地研究太极拳对于健康的益处,否则太极拳相关的研究将继续零星分散,并限制大型资助机构支持这些研究成果的推广应用。
Although the medical profession has published a large number of papers advocating the widespread use of Taijiquan in health-related aspects, there is almost no extensive and systematic application of these programs. This may be ascribed to the paucity of organizations that have the capacity to fund large programs of implementation and monitoring, such as the lack of government health agencies or national health NGO-related national non-governmental organizations. However, due to conflicting priorities and criteria in determining the effectiveness and effectiveness of Tai Chi, there is a lack of evidence that these organizations should undertake these projects. Existing Effectiveness Ensuring internal efficacy through acceptable design (eg, randomized controlled trials involving rigorous protocols) makes sense, but different approaches need to be used to demonstrate benefits beyond research control. This article examines the quality, quantity, relative odds of randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and dissemination studies in medical literature, emphasizing the differences in efficacy and effectiveness of research focusing on the healthy development of Taiji research systems, pointing out that unless more researchers Promised to systematically study the health benefits of Taijiquan in a systematic and systematic manner or Taijiquan-related research will continue to be fragmented and to limit the promotion of the use of these research results by large-scale funding agencies.