论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对四种来自西方的人格障碍检测工具的效度进行比较研究。方法 :本研究将四种人格障碍检测工具IPDE (国际人格障碍检查 )、SCID -Ⅱ (DSM -Ⅲ -R人格障碍临床定式检测 )、SCID -ⅡPQ(DSM -Ⅲ -R人格障碍筛查问卷 )、PDI -Ⅳ (DSM -Ⅳ人格障碍检测 )在中国大陆人群中抽样测试并进行效度检验。结果 :在四个检测工具中强迫型、回避型、依赖型、表演型、边缘型、反社会型、分裂样型和偏执型等 8个人格障碍型别具有较好的效度 ;IPDE较其他检测工具的效度更为完善。IPDE的不足之处 :项目 8、9结构稳定性差 ;项目 2、 3、 8、 2 4、 2 5、 2 9、 5 2的区分度较差。结论 :强迫型、回避型、依赖型、表演型、边缘型、反社会型、分裂样型和偏执型等 8个人格障碍型别有较好的独特性和鉴别诊断效能 ;IPDE较其他检测工具有更好的可操作性。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the validity of four personality disorder testing tools from the West. Methods: Four types of personality disorder detection tools such as IPDE (International Personality Checkup), SCID-II (DSM-III-R Personality Disorder Clinical Determinate Test), SCID-IIPQ (DSM-III -R Personality Disorder Screening Questionnaire) , PDI-Ⅳ (DSM-Ⅳ personality disorder test) in mainland China, sample testing and validity testing. Results: Eight types of personality disorder such as obsessive-compulsive, avoidant, dependent, performative, marginal, antisocial, schizoid and paranoid type had good validity among the four testing tools; IPDE was better than others The validity of testing tools is more perfect. Inadequacy of IPDE: Item 8,9 has poor structural stability; items 2, 3, 8, 2 4, 2 5, 2 9, 5 2 are poorly differentiated. Conclusion: Eight personality disorders such as obsessive-compulsive, avoidant, dependent, performative, marginal, antisocial, schizoid and paranoid have better uniqueness and differential diagnostic efficacy. IPDE is superior to other testing tools Have better operability.