出版史料的辑注和研究,在沉寂多年之后,又见兴旺,令人欣喜。进入历史的人和事,少则也是发生在数十年前,根据现有的材料和传说辑录成文,即使做得认真的佳作,还是可能出现一点差错,有的是引用的材料本身就有差错,虽然只是白璧微瑕而已。因而,我主张多作勘误。并且,也想试试,对于被我认为失实或有疑问的地方,或作勘误,或是商榷,就正于方家。 The annotation and study of the publication of historical materials, after many years of silence, also see the prosperity and rejoicing. The people and events entering the history are as few as a few decades ago. According to the existing materials and legends, it is still possible for mistakes to be made even if they are made with serious materials. Some of the cited materials themselves are in error. Only white bi slight it. Therefore, I advocate more errata. Also, I would like to try it. For those places that I consider to be inaccurate or in doubt, erratums or debates, it is just because of Fang’s family.