我是个书画爱好者,对当下的书画评论有所关注。我发现,有一种观点经常出现于评论中:书画界为社会的浮华浮躁气带坏了,为金钱而艺术,充斥铜臭气。这样的评价以偏概全,有失公允,姑且不论。让我困惑的是,类似的语言,屡屡出现在为某一艺术家个体唱赞歌的评论文章中,似乎成了一个写作套路,那就是贬一个模糊的整体来抬升某一具体的人。此类评论读得多了,我越来越困惑:既然此一个他是“清醒” I am a painter of painting and calligraphy, and I am concerned about the current calligraphy and painting commentary. I have found that there is often a point of view in the commentary: The world of calligraphy and painting for the glitz of society flooded impetuous gas, art for money, full of copper stench. This evaluation is too general, unfair, let alone. To my disbelief, a similar language, often appeared in a commentary that pays tribute to an individual artist, seems to be a writing routine that derogates a vague whole to elevate a specific person. Such comments read more, I am more and more confused: since this one he is “awake”