论文部分内容阅读
《中国环境管理》杂志1988年第6期发表了易先良同志的《环保局应能成为被告》一文。本人读后,觉得在环保局是否应该成为被告的问题上,有同易先良同志商榷的必要。易文对我于1988年3月15日在《中国环境报》上发表的《环保局不应是被告》一文中所提出的一些基本观点予以质疑,并指出我的观点是:“违背了有关法律的规定”。易文还认为:“在此类诉讼中,环保局可以是被告,如果不把环保局作为被告,那么只会助长行政机关的官僚
China Environmental Management magazine No. 6 of 1988 published Comrade Yi Xianliang’s “EPA should be the defendant,” a text. After reading, I feel that it is necessary to discuss with Comrade Yi Xianliang on the issue of whether the EPA should become the defendant. Yi Wen questioned some of the basic ideas I raised in my article “China Environmental Protection Bureau Should Not Be the Defendant” published on China Environment Newspaper on March 15, 1988 and pointed out that my point of view is: “I violated the relevant Legal provisions. ” Yi Wen also said: "In such litigation, the EPA can be the defendant, if not the EPA as the defendant, it will only fuel the bureaucratic bureaucracy