李立三的《党史报告》,与蔡和森的《中国共产党史的发展》、瞿秋白《中国共产党历史概论》等文献,是中共党内早期的三大重要党史资料。李立三作《党史报告》,正值他的“左”倾路线形成之时,并在他的《党史报告》中有所反映,然而,这个报告的史学价值、成就仍然应该予以实事求是的评价。以下作一初步的研究,探讨。一、报告年代和版本《党史报告》,目前知道的有两个版本。一是中央档案馆中保存的周恩来、冯菊坡的记录稿。但现已残缺,《盲动主义时期》一节仅剩开头两句话,以下应有“盲动主义的发生与发展”、“国际第九次扩大会议”、“第六次大会”三部分,已经缺 Li Lisan’s “Party History Report” and Cai Hesen’s “History of the Chinese Communist Party” and Qu Qiubai’s “An Introduction to the History of the Chinese Communist Party” and other documents are the three important pieces of historical party history in the early years of the CPC. Li Lisan made the report on the history of the party just as his “leftist” line was formed and was reflected in his “party history report.” However, the historical value and achievements of this report should still be evaluated objectively . The following for a preliminary study to explore. First, the report age and version of the “party history report”, currently know there are two versions. One is the record kept by Zhou Enlai and Feng Ju-po in the Central Archives. But now it is incomplete. The first sentence of the period of “putschism” is only the first two sentences left. There are three parts below: “the occurrence and development of dominationism”, “the 9th enlarged international conference” and “the 6th conference” lack