论文部分内容阅读
近期,《历史教学》杂志社开展的“中学历史课程改革及教材编写”的讨论,在史学界引起了普遍的关注。拜读许多专家、学者的“建设性意见”后,颇有同感,受益匪浅。笔者作为一名普通的中学历史教育工作者,也想借此机会,谈几点看法,若能抛砖引玉,也算是我们对新一轮课程改革尽了一点微薄之力。一、倾听倾诉:教材是什么? 倾诉之一:教材是让人强行热爱的冷血动物教材是常常煞有介事地说一些不着边际的废话却又不得不读、不背的东西;不给人以任何美感,却让人强行热爱的冷血动物。让你爱护又不得不将其翻烂的东
Recently, the discussion of the “reform of middle school history curriculum and the compilation of textbooks” carried out by “History Education” magazine has aroused widespread concern in the field of history. After reading the “constructive opinions” of many experts and scholars, I felt that I was very much sympathetic and benefited greatly. As an ordinary middle school history educator, the author would also like to take this opportunity to discuss several points of view. If we can initiate an elaboration, it can be considered that we have done a bit of a meager effort in the new round of curriculum reform. First, listen to what to say: What is the teaching material? One of the following: teaching materials are cold-blooded animal materials that people love and force to love. It is often to say something nonsense nonsense but has to read or not to back up; does not give any sense of beauty , but let people love cold-blooded animals. Make you love and have to rot it