“法律哲学諸问題”是一本篇幅不很多的法律专題研究著作,討論有关法律哲学上的几个问題。著者在本书中公开地承訊丁傳統邏辑——指的是三段論法——在司法裁判程序中的局限性和不足,虽则他与现实主义者不同,仍然給傳統邏辑在法律思想中留下了地位。本书开头就談了一些研究方式。在北欧国家中流行的这类法律科学,著者称之为“信条論”(dog-matics);据著者說,这是某些根据若干特定方向而假 The Problems of Legal Philosophy is a very limited volume of legal research work that discusses several issues related to legal philosophy. In this book, the author openly confesses to the traditional logic of the dictation - referring to the syllogism - the limitations and shortcomings in the procedure of judicial adjudication. Although different from the realists, he still gives the traditional logic in legal thought Left a status. At the beginning of the book, we talked about some research methods. This type of legal science, popular among the Nordic countries, is called dog-matics; according to the authors, it is something that is false based on certain directions