论文部分内容阅读
柳宗元的诗温丽靖深,深得骚学,蕴意深刻,颇受世人的推崇。明人对柳诗的评点除了在柳诗文集外,还存在于一些唐诗选本中。上海图书馆藏有桂天祥的《批点唐诗正声》,李攀龙辑、凌瑞森与凌南荣辑评的《李于鳞唐诗广选》,陈继儒批点的《删补唐诗选脉笺释会通评林》,锺惺选评的《唐诗归》与陆时雍选评的《唐诗镜》等。他们的评点对加深我们关于柳诗思想内容、艺术特色的理解以及丰富古代诗歌理论等皆有不同寻常的意义;它们体现出评点者们不同的诗学主张,也折射出明代诗文流派之间的论争;同时,评点本对文学史上一些名篇佳作的流传也起着不可忽视的重要作用。
Liu Zongyuan’s poems Wenli Jing deep, won the Sao studies, profound meaning, popular among the world’s respected. In addition to the collection of Liu poetry, the Ming Dynasty’s comment on Liu’s poetry still exists in some anthologies of Tang poetry. Shanghai Library has Gui Tianxiang’s “Criticism of Tang Poems”, Li Panlong, Ling Ruisen and Ling Nanrong’s “Li Yuanying Tang Poems Wide Selection”, Chen Ji-ru’s “ Review Lin ”, Zhong Xing selection of“ Tang poetry return ”and Lu Shiyong selection of“ Tang poetry ”and so on. Their commentaries have the unusual meaning of deepening our understanding of Liu’s poetry content, artistic features and enriching ancient poetry theories. They reflect the different poetic propositions of commenters and also reflect the differences between Ming Dynasty poetry genres At the same time, commenting on the spread of some famous works in the history of literature also plays an important role that can not be ignored.