论文部分内容阅读
案例指导制度的实施赋予指导性案例“应当参照”的效力,使其成为司法实践中案件裁判的重要依据。在指导性案例中适用修辞论证,一是由于指导性案例对说理的现实需要;二是“把法律作为修辞”的内在要求;三是“创设规则”的方法论功能要求必须借助修辞来论证所创规则的正当性。通过分析指导性案例38号法官的修辞运用,可以发现寻找共识是正确地适用修辞论证的关键所在,进而指出从法律原则、法的价值目标、社会事实中可以获得共识。
The implementation of the case guidance system gives the guiding case “the effectiveness of reference”, making it an important basis for case adjudication in judicial practice. The rhetorical argumentation applies in the guiding case, one is due to the practical need of the guiding case for reasoning; the other is the inherent requirement of “law as the rhetoric”; the third is the methodological requirement of “creating rules” must be based on rhetoric To demonstrate the legitimacy of the rules created. By analyzing the rhetoric of Judge No. 38 in Guiding Cases, we can find that finding a consensus is the key to the proper application of rhetorical argument. Furthermore, we point out that consensus can be obtained from the legal principles, the legal values of law and social facts.