论文部分内容阅读
目的:考察幼儿适应技能评定量表的信度和效度.方法:从分半信度、重测信度、评定者一致性信度以及同质性信度等方面进行信度检验.效度主要从以下两方面加以考察.1－ 结构效度:包括内部一致性和因素结构两方面;2－ 效标效度:包括幼儿适应技能评定量表与中国韦氏幼儿智力量表、儿童适应行为评定量表、盖塞尔儿童发展量表的相关.结果:1－ 城市样本各适应技能领域分半相关系数为0－92 ~0－96 ,CRONBACH''α系数为0－87 ~0－93 ,适应不良行为领域分半相关系数0－61 ,α系数0－58,农村样本结果与城市结果相近;2－ 适应技能总分重测相关系数0－98 ,评定者一致性系数0－93 ;3－ 因素分析提取出2 个因子,沟通、日常生活、社会化、运动技能主要负荷因子Ⅰ,适应不良行为领域主要负荷因子Ⅱ;4－ 适应技能总分与中国韦氏幼儿智力量表、儿童适应行为评定量表总分相关系数分别为0－81、0－85 ,与盖塞尔发展量表各领域相关系数为0－78 ~0－96.结论:幼儿适应技能评定量表的信、效度均较理想,符合心理计量学要求“,”To investigate the reliability and validity of the Adaptive Skill Rating Scale for Young Children(ASRSYC).Methods: The split-half reliability, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and interrater reliability were examed.A factor analysis procedure was used to explore the factor structure of ASRSYC. The criterion-related validity was evaluated through correlating ASRSYC with China-Wechsler Young Children Scale of Intelligence (C-WYCSI), Child Adaptive Behavior Scale (CABS), and Gesell Developmental Scale(GDS).Results: (1) The split-half correlations for the four domains of adaptive skill ranged from 0.92 to 0.96 for urban sample and from 0.90 to 0.96 for rural sample respectively, and the correlation for maladative behavior domain was 0.61 for urban sample and 0.70 for rural sample. Cronbach's α coefficients for adaptive skill domains ranged from 0.87 to 0.93 (urban sample) and from 0.88 to 0.94 (rural sample). The Cronbach's α for maladaptive behavior domain was 0.58 (urban sample) and 0.67 (rural sample). (2) The total score test-retest reliability was 0.98, and the total score interrater reliability was 0.93. (3) Two factors emerged following varimax rotation. (4) The correlations between total score of ASRSYC and C-WYCSI and CABS were 0.81 and 0.85 respectively, and the correlations between total score of ASRSYC and domain scores of GDS ranged from 0.78 to 0.96.Conclusion:The present findings suggest psychometrically satisfactory reliability and validity of ASRSYC when applied to Chinese children aged from 2.5 to 7 years.