论文部分内容阅读
苏共“26大”提出了超前发展有色冶金工业矿物原料基地的任务。这就要求明确规定其定义和计算原则,以便能够客观地评价本部门或一些分支部门矿物原料的潜力。由于没有统一的评价方法,不同的专家往往会得出不同的结论。例如,国外学者近年对一些国家、地区或全世界原料潜力所作的评价尝试,其结果很不相同,有的极其悲观,有的则非常乐观。苏联和其它国家的专家认为,没有肯定的评价的原因之一,是对这种评价的范畴和定义研究得很差。为确定原料资源的保证程度使用传统的矿产储量分类法是必需的,但是还不够。
The Soviet Communist Party “26 big ” put forward the task of advance development of non-ferrous metallurgy industrial mineral raw material base. This calls for a clear definition of its principles of definition and calculation in order to be able to objectively assess the potential of mineral raw materials in this sector or in some branches. In the absence of a uniform method of evaluation, different experts often come to different conclusions. For example, foreign scholars’ attempts to evaluate the potential of raw materials in some countries, regions or the world in recent years have shown very different results. Some are extremely pessimistic and others are very optimistic. Experts from the Soviet Union and other countries believe that one of the reasons for the lack of a positive assessment is the poorly studied scope and definition of such an assessment. The use of traditional mineral reserves classification to determine the degree of assurance of raw material resources is not sufficient.