论文部分内容阅读
南京,作为中华民国首都,曾经有过很多争议,至少有两次“建都之争”和一次“建都之议”。前两次是政治势力间的角逐,后一次是广大有志之士以国家民族前途为出发点的和平讨论。1937年抗战爆发,南京作为首都,在不到半年的时间里就沦陷了,这自然使人联想到南京作为首都的正当性。当抗战将要胜利时,关于战后国都的讨论便热烈起来,从1941年起,一直延续到1947年。其中,有人主张国都应在全国疆域的中心,安全而且
Nanjing, as the capital of the ROC, has had many controversies at least twice, including “the dispute over the capital” and “a negotiation on the capital.” The first two were competitions between political forces, and the latter was a peaceful discussion on the basis of the national future of the majority of people with lofty ideals. The outbreak of the war of resistance in 1937, Nanjing as the capital, fell in less than six months, which naturally reminds us of the legitimacy of Nanjing as the capital. When the war of resistance is about to victorious, discussions on the postwar capital are glowing, and from 1941 until 1947. Among them, some people argue that the country should be safe at the center of the country’s territory