论文部分内容阅读
目的分析评价不同脑电图检测方法对于诊断颅内感染及评估预后的效果。方法选取2013年7月-2015年7月医院接受治疗的颅内出现感染患者80例,全部分别接受常规脑电图检查和动态脑电图检查,比较2种检查方式的检查效果以及预后情况。结果常规检查的检查效果远远不如动态脑电图检查的效果,漏诊的情况较多(P<0.05);2种检查方式所检查出的重度异常的患者死亡或残疾情况并无明显的区别(P>0.05);常规脑电图检查出的非正常患者总体的死亡人数明显的多于动态脑电图检查(P<0.05)。结论为颅内感染患者及时进行脑电图检查具有很高的临床价值。使用动态脑电图机可以更好地提高颅内感染的诊断效果,并为患者预后情况进行评估,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To analyze and evaluate the effect of different EEG detection methods on diagnosis of intracranial infection and prognosis. Methods Eighty patients with intracranial infection who were treated in our hospital from July 2013 to July 2015 were selected. All of them were subjected to routine electroencephalogram (EEG) and dynamic electroencephalogram (EEG) examinations. The examination results and prognosis of the two methods were compared. Results The results of routine examination were far less effective than those of dynamic electroencephalography (EEG), with more missed diagnosis (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in death or disability among the patients with severe abnormalities detected by the two examinations P> 0.05). The total number of deaths in abnormal patients detected by conventional EEG was significantly more than that of dynamic EEG (P <0.05). Conclusions It is of high clinical value for timely detection of electroencephalography in patients with intracranial infection. The use of dynamic EEG can better improve the diagnosis of intracranial infection and prognosis of patients to assess the situation, it is worth promoting the use of clinical.