论文部分内容阅读
政策协同是政府解决复杂问题的重要方式,但我国的“大户籍”政策改革却提出了政策“反协同”的独特问题。政策“反协同”因原有的政策协同存在负面作用以及与新的政策环境和政策目标不匹配而提出,其途径有“中心”突破、“外围”剥离和双向改革三种基本方法。“大户籍”政策改革提出的政策“反协同”问题意味着在社会发展和政府治理转型时期,我国的政策管理存在协同和“反协同”的双重任务。这要求决策者加强各领域政策“顶层设计”的科学性,注意国家政策结构和政策关系的合理安排和长远规划。
Policy coordination is an important way for the government to solve complicated problems. However, the policy of “big household registration” in our country has put forward the unique policy of “counter-coordination”. Policy “Counter-Synergy ” is proposed because of the negative effect of existing policies and their mismatch with the new policy environment and policy objectives. There are three ways of “anti-synergy” such as “center” breakthrough, “periphery” stripping and two-way reform basic method. The policy proposed by the “big household policy reform” The issue of “counter-synergy” means that in the period of social development and government governance transformation, there are dual tasks of coordination and “counter-synergy” in our country’s policy management. This requires policymakers to strengthen the scientific nature of their “top-level design policies” in various fields and pay attention to the rational arrangements and long-term planning of the relations between the national policy structures and policies.