论文部分内容阅读
在古代,哲学究其本身被当作一种生活选择,一种以“共和德性”为主导的生活方式的践行。伊壁鸠鲁通过对传统生活方式的价值反思,教会我们如何重新认识自然和生命的存在,以“个体快乐”的心态应对生命中的每一时刻。这种对传统生活理念的颠覆引起了众多的质疑和批判。罗马时期的普鲁塔克为了重塑共和德性的基本精神,展开了对伊壁鸠鲁个体之乐的激烈批评。这是两种生活方式之间的争论,无论是以“德性”为主导的生活方式,还是“快乐”式的生活方式,都从根本上体现了不同生活境况下人们所理解的生活价值取向的基本可能性。
In ancient times, philosophy itself was regarded as a kind of life choice, a practice of life style dominated by “Republican virtue ”. Epicurus revisits the value of traditional lifestyles to teach us how to reconsider the existence of nature and life, and to deal with every moment in our lives in the spirit of “individual happiness.” This subversion of the traditional concept of life has caused many questions and criticisms. In the Roman period, Plutarch, in order to reshape the basic spirit of republican virtue, embarked on a fierce criticism of the individual music of Epicurus. This is a dispute between the two lifestyles. Whether it is based on “virtue ” as the leading way or the “happy ” way of life, it fundamentally reflects what people understand in different life situations The basic possibility of life value orientation.