【裁判要旨】行政机关对于当事人提出的信息公开的申请,书面答复不予公开,这种情况下,法院要对答复的内容进行实质性审查,认定行政机关不予公开的理由是否成立,并据此作出判决,而不应仅从形式上认定行政机关已经作出书面答复,即可视为已经履行了法定职责,对答复内容不服应另行提起诉讼。 In the circumstances, the court shall conduct a substantive examination of the contents of the reply and determine whether the administrative organ will not disclose its case or not, and according to which of the reasons for not publishing the information, This decision, rather than only formally determined that the executive has already made a written reply, that can be considered to have fulfilled the statutory duties, the content of the reply to a separate suit.