随着超市寄存柜顾客寄存物件丢失事件的不断发生,超市的自助寄存开始日益受到社会的关注和重视。而与超市寄存类似,宾馆酒店免费停车场中车辆的丢失等也开始成为民事纠纷的来源。如何界定这种因商事交易需要而附带的行为,众说纷纭。透过现象看本质,超市寄存行为其实是超市在贯彻利益最大化原则过程中,在和消费者进行商事经营活动中的附属商行为。本文指出从此角度出发来分析将更有益于纠纷的解决和问题症结的归属。 With the continuous loss of customer storage objects in supermarket lockers, self-service storage in supermarkets has been receiving more and more attention and attention from the public. And similar to the supermarket store, hotels and other free parking in the loss of vehicles have also begun to become a source of civil disputes. There are different opinions on how to define this incidental incidental to the needs of commercial transactions. Seeing through the phenomenon of the nature of the phenomenon, the supermarket store is actually the supermarkets in the process of carrying out the principle of maximizing profits, and the commercial activities of consumers in the subsidiary business. This article points out that analyzing from this point of view will be more beneficial to the resolution of disputes and the attribution of the crux of the problem.