论文部分内容阅读
在当今时代,种种迹象表明,学界对于经典的讨论正在悄然经历着一场话题重心的转移:即由对于“经典终结”的讨论,转向对于“如何读经典”的讨论。陆扬先生在《文学评论》2009年第2期发表的《经典与误读》一文中认为,误读经典,给经典去圣、去魅,会颠覆经典,从而会摧毁一个民族的文化之根,因此我们必须对经典保持无条件的敬畏。但从经典本身的属性、经典阅读主体、知识精英以及“误读”的实质角度进行论证,我们认为陆先生的持论是值得商榷的。陆扬的“无条件敬畏式”阅读本质上是一种盲目崇拜式阅读。从增强中华民族的整体文化创新力和文化创新性角度着眼,我们应该在对经典的平视之中融入批判性因子,以建构一种新型的经典阅读态度与方式。
In today’s era, there are indications that the discussion of classics in the academic circles is quietly undergoing a shift in the focus of the topic: the discussion of how to read the classics from the discussion of the classic end. In his article “Classics and Misreading” published in the 2nd issue of Literary Review 2009, Mr. Lu Yang argues that to misread the scriptures, to sanctify the classics, to detract the classics, will destroy the root of the culture of a nation , So we must maintain unconditional reverence for the classics. However, from the point of view of the nature of the classic itself, the subject of classical reading, the intellectual elite and the substance of “misreading,” we think that Mr. Lu’s argument is debatable. Lu Yang’s “unconditional awe-inspiring” reading is essentially a blind cult reading. From the perspective of enhancing the overall cultural creativity and cultural innovation of the Chinese nation, we should incorporate critical factors into the classic Horizons to construct a new type of attitude and approach to classical reading.