论文部分内容阅读
目的比较雾化吸入与外用药物治疗口腔黏膜糜烂的临床效果。方法采取随机数字法选取我院收治的口腔黏膜糜烂患者88例,分为两组,甲组采用雾化吸入治疗,乙组采用外用药无治疗,比较两种方法的治疗效果。结果研究表明,甲组患者的治疗总有效率明显优于乙组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用雾化吸入治疗口腔黏膜糜烂,可有效改善患者的临床症状,提高其生活质量,临床效果显著。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of inhalation and external application of oral mucosal erosion. Methods Eighty-eight patients with oral mucosal erosion treated in our hospital were selected by random number method and divided into two groups. Group A was treated with inhalation of nebulization. Group B was treated with external medicine without treatment. The therapeutic effects of the two methods were compared. Results The study showed that the total effective rate of treatment in group A was significantly better than that in group B, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The treatment of oral mucosal erosion with atomized inhalation can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and improve the quality of life of patients, and the clinical effect is remarkable.