我国的诉讼法虽然对审判程序正义优先的原则有所涉及,但对此并未进行详细阐述和加以具体规定,因而在进行案件的实际审理时缺乏可借操作的权威法律依据,由于概念的模糊和具体规定的缺乏,难免不使判断标准与真实事实出现偏离,有时甚至影响审判结论的正确得出。如果对程序正义优先原则不加以量化与规定,既不符合社会主义立法的基本要求,又背离了法律的公平公正原则。 Although the procedural law of our country is involved in the principle of priority of judicial procedure, it has not been elaborated and specified in detail. Therefore, there is no authoritative legal basis for the actual trial of the case because of the vagueness of the concept And the lack of specific provisions, it is inevitable that the standard of judgment does not deviate from the real facts, and sometimes even affect the correct conclusion of the trial. If we do not quantify and stipulate the principle of procedural justice first, it neither meets the basic requirements of socialist legislation nor deviates from the principle of fairness and justice of law.