纳博科夫就《包法利夫人》的评论,体现了其文学作品解读上的独辟蹊径,如以文本的细致阅读为基础,使用联系和比较的意识等。但是,其评论也存在失当之处,如重形式轻内容,认为文学无任何实用价值和执着于细枝末节。《文学讲稿》是以纳博科夫五十年代在康奈尔大学讲授文学课的讲稿为基础而编写成的,涉及对简·奥斯汀和狄更斯等七位欧洲作家代表作的评论。当时正值新批评理论在西方批评界的风靡期,讲稿本身对小说文本及 Nabokov’s comments on Madame Bovary embody the unique ways in which his works of literature are interpreted, such as the careful reading of texts, the use of connections and the comparison of consciousness. However, there are some misunderstandings in its comments, such as the heavy content of light content, that literature has no practical value and is attached to minutiae. Written on the basis of a speech by Nabokeus at the Cornell University in the 1950s, Literary Manuscript deals with commentary on the representative works of seven European writers, Jane Austen and Dickens. At that time, when the critique of the new theory of criticism in the West critics of the rage, the text of the novel itself and the novel