论文部分内容阅读
财产权与主权的关系、财产权与国际和平及发展的关系、全球化背景下国际法实践的基本趋势,以及财产权内涵的确定性都表明,在理解国际法方面,财产权逻辑可以构成传统主权逻辑之外的另一进路。迄今为止,国际法的财产权逻辑在权利主体、规制标准以及保护手段方面发生了重要变化,而在财产权观念方面并未发生明显变化,这对于以往以及未来的国际和平与发展都具有重要的影响。财产权逻辑的进路促使人们认识到国际法实践在主权之外还存在着或许更为绵长的动力,即财产权,从而有助于国际社会借鉴国内成熟的财产权法律经验,以国际法基本宗旨为基本依据,解构并重构现行国际法财产权逻辑,以切实实现并长期维护国际和平与发展,进而推动国际法治。
The relationship between property rights and sovereignty, the relationship between property rights and international peace and development, the basic trends in the practice of international law in the context of globalization, and the certainty of the connotation of property rights all show that in understanding international law, the logic of property rights can constitute other than the traditional logic of sovereignty A way. So far, the logic of property rights in international law has undergone major changes in the body of rights, the standard of regulation and the means of protection. There have been no significant changes in the concept of property rights, which have a significant impact on past and future international peace and development. The logic of property rights has prompted people to realize that there may be a longer-term motivation behind the practice of international law, that is, property rights, which will help the international community learn from the mature legal experience in property rights in China and base the basic purposes of international law. Deconstruct and reconstruct the existing logic of property rights in international law so as to effectively achieve and long-term maintain international peace and development so as to promote the rule of international law.