我经常思考这样一个问题:对一个历史教师来说,最重要的是什么?是讲课技巧?还是拥有自己的教育观?许多教师认为教材分析是最重要的,因而师范大学成了制造合格的教书机器的工厂,于是,历史学中成“体系的基本的”知识与技能、截长续短地变成各种条条框框,再由此执行极具政治功能性质的历史解释,教给学生去背。致于教学,实在是 I often think about such a question: What is the most important thing for a history teacher? Is it a lecture technique? Or has my own education concept? Many teachers believe that the analysis of teaching materials is the most important, and that normal universities have become qualified teaching materials. The factory of the machine, therefore, the basic knowledge and skills of the history system, the system’s basic knowledge and skills, and the truncated length of the system have been changed into various types of rules and regulations, and the historical explanation of the extremely politically functional nature has thus been performed. Back. To teaching, it is really