论文部分内容阅读
自民国以来,学界对于《竹林诗评》性质及作者的认识皆含混不清。通过史料考辨及北京大学图书馆所藏明成化本朱奠培《松石轩诗评》的研究,可考知《竹林诗评》实际为朱奠培《松石轩诗评》的节略本。冯惟讷《古诗纪》节录《松石轩诗评》中的先唐部分,署为《竹林诗评》等题名。清宛委山堂本《说郛》又据以辑出,专列一卷,于是便有了以《竹林诗评》为题名的别行本。《竹林诗评》最主要的特点是形象化的比喻评诗,这种方式远法敖陶孙《臞翁诗评》等宋人诗话,直接师承则来自于其祖父宁献王朱权的《太和正音谱》。
Since the Republic of China, academics have confused the nature of “Bamboo Poems Review” and the author’s understanding. Through the research of historical data and Pei Chenghua’s Cheng Chenghua’s “Song Shi Xuan’s Poetry Criticism” in Peking University Library, we can know that the “Zhulin Poem Review” actually is a diathesis of Zhu Mianpei’s “Poems of Songshi Xuan”. Feng Wene “Ancient Poetry” excerpt “Song Shi Xuan poem” in the first part of the Tang Dynasty, Department for the “Bamboo Poetry Review” and other titles. Ching Wan Committee Hill Church, “said 郛” and then edited out, a special column, so there is a “Bamboo Poems Review” as the title of the book. The most important characteristic of Bamboo Forest Poetry Criticism is figurative poetic criticism. In this way, the poems of Song Taoist poets such as Taoist Poems of Weng Weng, Sound spectrum. "