论文部分内容阅读
自明代以来,历史上的宋江是否以梁山泊为据点起事就聚讼不休,而上世纪50年代大多数学者都倾向于宋江起事与梁山泊无关。近日有学者发现元代僧人楚石梵琦两则有关水浒的诗,认为这是“宋江起事于梁山的重要文献依据”。但宋代官方文献和文人著述均无宋江起事于梁山的记载,楚石梵琦有关宋江起事于梁山的观点应当是受到宋元以来民间说话和水浒杂剧的影响,属于晚出文献,因此不宜高估其学术价值。
Since the Ming Dynasty, whether or not Song Jiang in the history took Liangshanpo as a starting point for litigation ended in a lawsuit. Most scholars in the 1950s tended to have nothing to do with Liangshan uprising. Recently, some scholars found that the Yuan Dynasty monk Chu Shi Fan Qi two poems about the Water Margin, that this is “Song Jiang incident in Liangshan important literature basis ”. However, neither the official literature nor the literati’s writings in the Song Dynasty recorded the occurrence of Liang in Liangshan. Chu Shi Fan Qi’s view that Song Jian’s uprising in Liangshan should have been influenced by folk talk and Water Margin Zaju since Song and Yuan Dynasties belonged to later literature, Overestimate its academic value.