王嘉惠同志这篇探讨争鸣性文章颇具价值,符合我刊“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的办刊思想。回头审视2014年3期那篇文章虽有些许瑕疵,但由于事物的无限广大与复杂多样,真理总是相对的,我们应淡化对错、只求理明。文章三部分环环相扣,论证部分有理有据,亮点盘点看似多余而实则是从侧面进一步论证试题好在何处,使论据更加翔实、文章更具说服力。由此不难看出,本文架构颇费心思,脉络简明清晰,内容跌宕起伏,行文娓娓道来,虽是“找茬”却也令人心悦诚服,我们不禁为作者的敬业与担当点赞! Comrade Wang Jiahui’s article on this controversial article is of great value, which is in line with the journal’s thought of running a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contending. Reviewing the 2014 issue 3 Although there are slight flaws in the article, the truth is always relative due to the infinite variety and variety of things, and we should try our best to be fair and correct. The three parts of the article are closely interlinked, and the justification of the part of the argument is that the inventory of the bright spots may seem superfluous but in fact it is to further prove the whereabouts of the questions from the side and make the argument more informative and the article more persuasive. It is not difficult to see, this architecture is a lot of thought, clear and concise context, ups and downs of content, wenwenweweilai, although it is “finding fault” but also heartfelt, we can not help but dedication for the author and play praise!