论文部分内容阅读
２１世纪的文化，其标准就是江泽民同志所说的先进的文化。古典文学研究的价值大体可以概 括为两个方面，即研究的社会价值和研究的科学价值。建国后的一段时期，我们曾过分强调 其社会价值，８０年代后学术界对此进行了调整和反拨。但同时又产生了忽略其社会价值的弊 端。如漠视知识分子的道义责任、回避价值判断等等。在对学科自身的审视上也存在着一 定的偏颇。鉴于此，有必要重新探寻古典文学研究的价值所在，并以此为支点，阐扬它在当 代文化建设中的重要意义，使古代文学研究在新的世纪充满生机和活力，为建设我们的先进 文化发挥更大的作用。本刊２００１年第３期曾就这一问题组织过一次笔谈，其独特的视角引起了学术界广泛的关注。 今天，我们再次选发一组博士生的文章，以期将讨论进一步引向深入。本期《学术新论坛》发表的另外一篇文章《“传统”与“断裂”的困惑》，对近几年文学研 究中出现的一些否定“五四”的议论进行了思考，颇有启迪，值得一读。
The standard of 21st century culture is Comrade Jiang Zemin’s advanced culture. The value of classical literature research can be roughly summarized in two aspects, namely the social value of research and the scientific value of research. For some time after the founding of the People’s Republic, we have overemphasized its social value. After the 1980s, the academic circles adjusted and reversed it. At the same time, however, it has its drawbacks of ignoring its social value. Such as ignoring the moral responsibility of intellectuals, to avoid judging value and so on. There is also a certain bias in the examination of the subject itself. In view of this, it is necessary to re-explore the value of classical literature, and as a fulcrum, to demonstrate its significance in the construction of contemporary culture, so that ancient literature in the new century is full of vitality and vitality for the building of our advanced culture Play a greater role. This issue No. 3 of 2001 has organized a written discussion on this issue, its unique perspective has aroused widespread concern in academia. Today, we once again elect a group of doctoral students article, with a view to further deepen the discussion. Another article in this issue of Academic Forum, “Tradition” and “Puzzle of Fracture,” enlightens some of the arguments that negated “May the Fourth” in literature studies in recent years. Worth reading