论文部分内容阅读
《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》第九条规定为司法实践处理受贿案件提供了明确依据,但在理解和运用中,对相关问题仍存分歧。索取贿赂后退还或者上交的,依然成立受贿罪,不适用《意见》第九条第一款。对是否“及时”的评判不应局限于一个单纯的时间概念,而应当联系行为人是否具有受贿故意具体分析。《意见》第九条第二款的理解应当以第一款为基础,对“掩饰犯罪”应当作为相联系的主客观方面来进行综合分析,以求对受贿罪的性质认定更加准确。
Article 9 of the Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Bribery provides a clear basis for judicial practice in handling bribed cases. However, in the course of understanding and application, there are still differences on relevant issues. Refunded or surrendered after obtaining a bribe, the bribery was still established and the first paragraph of Article 9 of the Opinion was not applicable. The judgment of whether “timely ” should not be limited to a simple concept of time, but should be linked to whether the actor has a bona fide intentional analysis. The understanding of Article 9, paragraph 2, of the “Opinion” should be based on the first paragraph, and a comprehensive analysis should be conducted on the subjective and objective aspects of “concealing a crime” so as to make the nature of the bribery more accurate.