论文部分内容阅读
1946年至1948年间,江西省南昌县小蓝乡境内发生了一系列窃割电话电报线案件,为此,南昌县政府受到了来自电信管理部门和省政府要求其迅速破案和防止此类案件再次发生的巨大压力,并三番五次催促小蓝乡缉拿窃犯和严加防护。小蓝乡最初对此无动于衷,只是在受到多次催促后才呈书一封,陈明该乡既无力破案,也无防护责任。频繁发生的窃线案件最终都不了了之,无一破获。“窃线”案频繁且持续发生,自有其经济因素,但它反映的却是地方政府、乡镇基层政权与乡村社会政治关系的现实。由此可以看出,近代以来特别是进入20世纪后,传统乡村社会秩序虽逐步瓦解,国家权力开始向乡村社会渗透、延伸,但在某些传统乡村,乡村基层政权或许只具象征意义,在国家权力侵害到其具体利益时,乡村社会依然能够有效表达其意志,并抵制国家权力的侵害。这种抵制,在一定意义上说,是作为一个具有悠久历史的生命体对国家权力在乡村延伸的本能反应。
From 1946 to 1948, a series of cases of telephone wire telephony broke out in Xiao Lanxiang, Nanchang County, Jiangxi Province. To this end, the Nanchang county government received a request from the telecommunications administration and the provincial government to promptly solve the case and prevent such cases from happening again The tremendous pressure that has taken place has repeatedly urged Xiaolan Township to arrest the guilty of theft and strict protection. Little Blue Township initially indifferent to this, but after repeated reminders before a book, Chen Ming Township neither able to solve the case, there is no defense responsibility. Frequent cases of theft are ultimately lost, no one cracked. However, it reflects the reality of the political relations between local governments, township grassroots political power and rural society. From this we can see that since the modern era, especially after entering the 20th century, although the traditional rural social order gradually collapsed and state power began to infiltrate and extend to rural communities, in some traditional villages the rural grass-roots political power may only have symbolic significance. When state power infringes upon its specific interests, rural society can still effectively express its will and resist the violation of state power. In a certain sense, this boycott is an instinctive reaction to the extension of state power in the countryside as a life with a long history.