论文部分内容阅读
目的腹腔镜小创伤手术治疗输卵管妊娠切开取胚过程中采用不同手术方法术中出血及手术时间,术后血HCG下降速度及术后并发症的方面对比。方法本区经济比较落后,从2009年才开始行腹腔镜手术方法 ,2012年开始开展输卵管切开取胚术,现将2012年至今本院开始实施输卵管妊娠切开取胚术共49例患者不同手术操作的方法进行对比,对照组共18例,改进组共31例。结果腹腔镜下输卵管切开取胚术对有生育要求的患者是一种安全有效的手术方法。行不同的手术操作方法 ,改进组的术中出血少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组术后血HCG下降差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜下用单极电凝切开妊娠部位治疗输卵管妊娠效果显著,值得推广。
Objective To compare the operative bleeding, operative time, postoperative blood HCG decline rate and postoperative complications in the surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy with small trauma. Methods The economy in this area is relatively backward. Laparoscopic surgery was started only in 2009 and tubal incision and embryo embedding was performed in 2012. A total of 49 patients undergoing tubal pregnancy and embryo implantation and embryo implantation have been started in our hospital from 2012 till now. Methods of operation were compared, a control group of 18 cases, a total of 31 cases improved group. Results Laparoscopic tubal incision embryo implantation is a safe and effective surgical method for patients with reproductive requirements. (P <0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative blood HCG (P> 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic electrocoagulation with unipolar incision of the pregnancy site treatment of tubal pregnancy effect is significant, it is worth promoting.