论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者雾化吸入的选择以及护理。方法:将78例慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用超声雾化吸入加鼻塞吸氧治疗,观察组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗,两组患者均进行有效护理,对比两组患者治疗前后的Sa O2值。结果:治疗后观察组患者的Sa O2值是(88.47±5.56)%,对照组Sa O2值是(74.77±6.35)%,治疗后Sa O2比较差异显著(t=10.137,P=0.000)。结论:慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗效果要优于超声雾化吸入治疗,通过与有效护理措施相结合,能够显著增加患者的Sa O2。
Objective: To explore the choice and nursing of atomization inhalation in COPD patients with respiratory failure. Methods: 78 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure were divided into control group and observation group. The control group was treated with ultrasonic inhalation plus nasal inhalation and oxygen inhalation. Oxygen-driven atomization inhalation was used in the observation group, and both groups were given effective nursing , Comparing the two groups of patients before and after treatment of Sa O2 value. Results: Sa O2 value of the observation group was (88.47 ± 5.56)% after treatment, and (74.77 ± 6.35)% for the control group. There was significant difference in Sa O2 after treatment (t = 10.137, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Oxygen-driven aerosol inhalation in patients with COPD and respiratory failure is superior to ultrasonic nebulization and can significantly increase Sa O2 in patients with COPD through effective nursing intervention.