对逻辑经验主义的两个教条的批判是蒯因的哲学思想中的非常重要的一笔。在其著作《经验主义的两个教条》中,他提出两个教条——相信分析陈述和综合陈述二者之间有严格的区分和还原论——是没有存在的必要的。他的这一批判不仅为他后来的整体论铺就道路,而且对当时的英美分析哲学产生了很大的影响。本文将从两个教条的具体内容和对英美分析哲学的影响来简单叙述蒯因的思想。 Criticism of the two doctrines of logical empiricism is a very important one in his philosophy. In his book The Empiricist Doctrine, he proposed two doctrines - there is no such thing as necessity - to believe there is a strict distinction and reductionism between analytic and synthetic statements. His criticism not only paved the way for his later holism, but also had a great impact on the Anglo-American analytical philosophy of that time. This article will briefly explain the thoughts of Qiu because of the specific content of the two dogma and the impact on Anglo-American analytical philosophy.