论文部分内容阅读
为了弥补国家社科基金项目政府导向型创新体制的弊端,我国采取专家学者参与这种非制度化的路径以解决信息不对称和理性有限等政府失灵的问题,形成了政府-学科导向型法学创新体制。但专家学者自身也存在信息不对称和理性有限等问题,而且他们还是直接的利益相关者,这就决定了这样的路径安排难以根本克服其弊端。中国应该选择一种市场导向型法学创新体制,并借助于市场这种制度化的信息披露机制和信息识别机制来解决其政府失灵的问题。因此,在战略上,中国法学创新体制应该实现由政府-学科导向型向市场-政府导向型的转型;在战术上,建立全国统一的健康有活力的法学创新市场,形成政府与市场的合理分工,改变政府现行的管理方式和手段。
In order to make up for the shortcomings of the government-oriented innovation system of the National Social Science Fund Project, China adopted the path of non-institutional participation by experts and scholars to solve the problem of government failure such as information asymmetry and limited rationality, forming a government-discipline-oriented legal innovation system. However, experts and scholars themselves have problems of asymmetric information and limited rationality, and they are still direct stakeholders. This determines that such a routing arrangement can hardly overcome its drawbacks at all. China should choose a market-oriented jurisprudence innovation system and solve the problem of government failure by means of the market’s institutionalized information disclosure mechanism and information recognition mechanism. Therefore, in terms of strategy, China’s legal innovation system should be transformed from a government-subject oriented to a market-government oriented type. On tactics, a unified national health and vitality legal innovation market should be established to form a rational division of labor between the government and the market , Change the government’s current management methods and means.