论文部分内容阅读
在人类中心主义和非人类中心主义对人与自然关系所做的道德谋划失败以后,马克思关于劳动首先是人与自然之间的物质变换的思想,既为重新确认生态伦理学存在的合法性提供了正当理由,也为生态伦理以善恶为核心向道德权利以义务为核心的转向奠定了基础。从马克思的物质变换思想出发,生态伦理何以为善的根据不再是人的利益,也不再是自然本身的权利和内在价值,而是人与自然之间的物质变换,正是这种物质变换决定了人类拥有向自然界提取自己所需物质资料以养育自身的道德权利,也规定了人类必须承担反馈自身的能量以养育自然环境的道德义务。
After the failure of ethical planning of man-nature relationship by anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism, Marx’s idea that labor is first and foremost a material transformation between man and nature not only provides for the confirmation of the legitimacy of the existence of ecological ethics For proper reasons, but also for the ecological ethics to good and evil as the core of the moral rights to obligations as the core of the steering laid the foundation. From Marx’s thought of material transformation, the basis for why ecological ethics are good is no longer the interest of man, nor is it the nature and intrinsic value of nature itself, but the material transformation between man and nature. It is this matter The transformation determines that human beings have the moral right to extract the material information they need from nature to raise themselves, and also stipulates that the human beings must shoulder the moral obligation of feeding back their own energy to raise the natural environment.