论文部分内容阅读
近20年来,“网络”研究成为了经济学、社会学和历史学的热门课题。此类研究的兴起肇因于学术界探求二战以降亚洲经济腾飞的内在动因,而制度变迁理论和社会资本理论为其提供了经济学和社会学的理论背景,同时该类研究还反映出对西方中心论的反思,蕴含着发现中国-亚洲自身历史的学术关怀。90年代至今,采用“网络”视角考察中国商业组织、同乡团体、跨国贸易和企业经营的论著大量涌现,亦有学者将商业网络、同乡网络、跨国贸易网络、家族网络、个人网络等置于中国企业史的框架中加以综合考察。“网络”的视野突出了人的能动因素,揭示出历史的复杂面相。然而“网络”概念作为比喻或分析工具的方便、有效与弹性,也使之面临泛滥化和空洞化的危机。此外,中外企业关系网的异同、关系网中的等级制、外国人与中国关系网,以及在华外国企业对中国区域关系网产生的作用等,都是“网络”视野下的中国企业史研究应该进一步关注的问题。
In the past 20 years, the study of “network” has become a hot topic in economics, sociology and history. The rise of such studies is due to the intrinsic motivation of the academic circles to explore the World War II to reduce the economic take-off in Asia. The institutional change theory and social capital theory provide the theoretical background of economics and sociology. At the same time, Reflections on the central theory contain the academic concern of discovering China’s own history in Asia. Since the 1990s, there have been a large number of studies on Chinese commercial organizations, fellow groups, transnational trade and business operations using the perspective of “network ”. Some scholars have also put commercial networks, fellow networks, transnational trade networks, family networks and personal networks In the framework of the history of Chinese enterprises to conduct a comprehensive inspection. “Network ” horizons highlight the human dynamic factors, reveals the complex history of history. However, the convenience, effectiveness and resilience of the concept of “network” as a metaphor or analytical tool also expose it to flooding and hollowing out of crisis. In addition, the similarities and differences between Chinese and foreign business networks, the hierarchical structure of the networks, the networks of foreigners and China, and the role of foreign companies in China in China’s regional networks are all Chinese enterprises under the “network” perspective History should pay more attention to the problem.