论文部分内容阅读
随着我国民事审判方式的改革对当事人举证的强化,以及一提到依职权收集证据,大多数人首先浮于脑海的是我国的职权主义模式甚至是超职权主义模式,因此很多学者认为应当取消法院依职权调查取证。但是笔者却认为依职权收集证据在目前我国来讲是有必要的。故本文拟从立法、学理、司法实践三个方面来讨论这一制度。
As China’s reform of civil trial strengthens the parties’ testimony and when it comes to collecting evidence according to their powers, most people first come to mind is our country’s mode of power or even super-power, so many scholars think it should be canceled The court investigated and evidenced the ex officio. However, the author thinks it is necessary for our country to collect evidence according to its authority. Therefore, this article intends to discuss this system from the legislative, academic and judicial practices.