法律解释的问题归根到底是一个历史性问题。由于表达者、立法者与理解者、解释者处于不同的时间和地点,使法律文本呈现不同的意涵。这种“遮蔽”首先为思想和语言的特征所决定。各种解释因而终归应该都是某钟“发生学”的解释。又由于法律解释的目的在于适用,因此,解释者既要运用理性,又要面对良知。而本文着重探讨的是前者,即思考如何努力实现“视域重合”。 The legal interpretation of the issue is ultimately a historic issue. Because the expressionist, the legislator and the interpreter are at different times and places, the legal texts have different meanings. This “shadowing” is first determined by the characteristics of thought and language. Therefore, various interpretations should therefore always be interpreted as “learning”. And because the purpose of legal interpretation is to apply, therefore, the interpreter must not only apply reason but also face conscience. This article focuses on the former, that is, thinking how to work hard to achieve “coincidence of sight”.