论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨和分析LEEP刀和微波治疗中、重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果。方法:此次研究选择我院在2014年8月-2016年8月期间收治的148例宫颈糜烂患者作为研究主体,按患者入院顺序分为甲组和乙组,每组各74例患者。甲组患者通过LEEP刀进行治疗,乙组患者通过微波进行治疗,比较甲乙两组患者的治疗有效率和临床情况。结果:甲组患者治疗有效率高于乙组患者,手术时间、阴道流液时间、术中出血以及术后出血量均少于乙组患者,差异对比存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:同微波治疗相比较来说,LEEP刀治疗中、重度宫颈糜烂的有效率很高,且手术时间以及患者阴道流液时间较短,患者术中、术后出血量也较少,值得推广。
Objective: To investigate and analyze the clinical effect of LEEP knife and microwave in the treatment of severe cervical erosion. Methods: The study selected 148 cases of cervical erosion patients admitted to our hospital from August 2014 to August 2016 as the main body of study. Patients were divided into group A and group B according to the order of admission, with 74 patients in each group. Patients in group A were treated by LEEP knife, patients in group B were treated by microwave, and the treatment efficiency and clinical status of patients in group A and B were compared. Results: The treatment efficiency of Group A patients was higher than that of Group B patients. The operation time, vaginal fluid flow time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative bleeding volume were less than those of patients in Group B, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with microwave treatment, LEEP knife treatment, severe cervical erosion is highly efficient, and the operation time and the patient’s vaginal fluid time is short, patients with less postoperative bleeding, it is worth promoting .