论文部分内容阅读
【目的】分析已经发表的学术不端论文的特征,尽量避免漏检情况的发生。【方法】利用科技期刊学术不端文献检测系统(AMLC)对《放射学实践》杂志2015年发表的301篇论文进行检测,并对认定为不端论文在发表之前的检测过程进行追踪、溯源。【结果】6篇被认定为不端论文,其中3篇论文的文字重合度≥40%;论文发表之前进行的两次检测中,6篇论文的文字重合度均<40%;5篇的发表时间与被抄袭文献的发表时间接近(不超过3个月);4篇不端论文与被抄袭文献存在作者重合。【结论】通过分析漏检不端论文的特征,做好以下三点:1检测者采取正确的检测策略,坚持在出刊前进行最后的检测;2AMLC及时更新对比数据库;3更多的期刊采用“稿件追踪”功能,AMLC对学术不端论文的漏检将大幅减少。
【Objective】 To analyze the characteristics of academic misconducts that have been published and try to avoid the occurrence of missed inspections. 【Method】 301 papers published in Journal of Radiology Practice in 2015 were screened by using AMLC (Scientific Missed Literature Detection System), and the testing process of pre-publication dissertation was traced and traced. 【Results】 Six of the six papers were identified as misdeclared papers, of which the overlapping degree of the three papers was ≥40%. The textual coincidences of the six papers were <40% of the two tests conducted prior to the publication of the papers; and the five papers were published The time is close to the published time of the copied document (no more than 3 months); the 4 disagreeable papers overlap the author of the plagiarized document. [Conclusion] By analyzing the characteristics of misdiagnosis papers, we can do the following three points: 1 the examiner adopts the correct testing strategy and insists on the final test before publication; 2 AMLC timely updates the comparative database; 3 more journals “Manuscript tracking ” function, AMLC missed misdiagnosis of academic papers will be substantially reduced.