五一廣場東漢簡牘自出土以來,尤其是《湖南長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘發掘簡報》~([1])及《長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘選釋》~([2])發表之後,學者們從多個角度對之給予了較多的關注。李洪財先生專門針對《選釋》中文字的俗寫及隸定問題進行了討論,除了因對整理體例理解不同而產生的分歧及個别仍可探討的文字外,已非常正確地指出了整理者的一些明顯誤釋,如三一簡中的“來”字應釋爲“求”、五五簡中的“盛”字應爲“歲”、一六六 Since the unearthed Hanzhong in the Han dynasty, Wuyi Square, especially after the release of the “Donghan Bamboo Slips Excavation at May 1 Square, Changsha, Hunan Province” and “The Selection of the Eastern Han Dynasty Bamboo Slips in Changsha 51 May Square” ~ ([2]) , Scholars have given more attention to it from many angles. Mr. Li Hongcai devoted himself to the vulgar writing and jailing of Chinese characters in “Selected Sentences”. Apart from the disagreement on differences in comprehension and individual writings that could still be explored, it was quite right to point out that the arrangers Some obvious mistaken explanations, such as the Sanyamba “” to “word should be interpreted as” seeking “, the May 5 Jane ” Sheng “should be ” years ", one hundred sixteen