明钟惺、谭元春所辑《古诗归》中,录有武王《几铭》,清周亮工认为铭文“口”字,本是阙文符号,钟、谭为妄改。这是晚明以来批评《诗归》的一个公案。近人王欣夫、钱钟书考订,认为钟、谭《诗归》所录不误;本文从《大戴礼记》版本入手,对王、钱的考证,作了较多补证,从而论定《几铭》中“口”字确非阙文,首为阙文之说者,实始周亮工。同时对钱钟书的征引错误,也作了纠正。 Ming Zhongxing, Tan Yuanchun edited by the “ancient poetry”, recorded King of Wu “Ming”, Qing Zhou Liang workers that the inscription “mouth ” the word, this is Que text symbol, bell, Tan is a jump. This is a public case of criticism of “returning poetry” since late Ming. Nearly Wang Xinfu, Qian Zhongshu examination, that bell, Tan “poetry return” recorded correct; this article from the “Dai Dai Li Ji” version of the king, the text of the textual research, made a lot of evidence, which theory Set “a few ming” in the “mouth” is indeed a non-Que word, the first Que Wenzhi said who actually started Zhou Liang. At the same time, Qian’s call for mistakes, also made a correction.